Indian Philosophical Models and Growth of Behavioral Science in India: Implications for Indigenous Spiritual Psychology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31305/rrjiks.2025.v2.n2.031Keywords:
Indian psychology, Vedas, Upanishads, mindfulness, spiritual psychology, behavioral scienceAbstract
Indian philosophical traditions including Vedas, Upanishads, Yoga, Vedanta, Buddhism, and Jainism offer sophisticated models of consciousness, mind body relations, and psychological functioning that continue to shape contemporary thought. This paper analyses key contributions from Vedic and Upanishadic conceptions of self, Samkhya Yoga dualism, and Buddhist and Jain theories of cognition to highlight the continuing relevance of indigenous spiritual psychology. These schools conceptualize the mind–body complex as an instrument grounded in a deeper substratum of consciousness and articulate structural and functional models of mental processes that parallel modern psychological constructs. Using qualitative conceptual and textual analysis, this study examines classical Indian philosophical sources alongside contemporary psychology literature. Primary texts addressing consciousness, mental processes, and contemplative methods were systematically reviewed and compared with major themes in Western psychological theories. No empirical or statistical analyses were employed. The aim was to identify core philosophical principles and evaluate their relevance to present-day psychological paradigms. The findings indicate that Indian traditions provide a multilayered understanding of mind, personality, and well-being that enriches contemporary frameworks related to mindfulness, meditation, self-regulation, and holistic mental health. These perspectives increasingly inform global psychology, particularly in areas of well-being, contemplative practices, and transpersonal development. This study argues that integrating Indian philosophical insights into Western psychological models offers promising directions for advancing the scientific study of cognition, consciousness, and behavioural processes. Future research should further explore how these philosophical methodologies can contribute to culturally grounded and integrative psychological theories.
References
Hiriyanna, M. (1993). Outlines of Indian philosophy. Motilal Banarsidass.
James, W. (2002). The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature (Original work published in 1902). Routledge.
Jung, C. G. (1958). Psychology and religion: West and East. Princeton University Press.
Kuppuswamy, B. (1985). Elements of ancient Indian psychology. Vikas Publishing House.
Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being (2nd ed.). Van Nostrand.
Rao, K. R. (2014). Indian psychology: Implications and applications. Foundations and applications of Indian psychology, 3-17.
Rao, K. R., & Paranjpe, A. C. (2016). Psychology in the Indian tradition. Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2440-2
Sinha, J. (1986). Indian psychology: Perception. Motilal Banarsidass.
Swami A. (1967).“Yoga Psychology”.Ramakrishna Vedanta Math, Calcutta.
Sinha, J. (1985). Indian psychology (Vols. 1–2). Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
Grof, S. (1975). Realms of the human unconscious: Observations from LSD research. Viking.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain and illness. New York, NY: Delacorte.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
Shapiro, S. L., Carlson, L. E., Astin, J. A., & Freedman, B. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 373–386.
Dahl, C. J., Lutz, A., & Davidson, R. J. (2015). Reconstructing and deconstructing the self: Cognitive mechanisms in meditation practice. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(9), 515–523.
Gallagher, S. (2017). Enactivist interventions: Rethinking the mind. Oxford University Press.
Josipovic, Z. (2019). Nondual awareness: Consciousness-as-such as non-representational reflexive awareness. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1461, 5–19.
Lutz, A., Jha, A. P., Dunne, J. D., & Saron, C. D. (2015). Investigating the phenomenological matrix of mindfulness-related practices. American Psychologist, 70(7), 632–658.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420–430.
